Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Reasons Windows (Still) Requires Defragging

  • Subject: Re: Reasons Windows (Still) Requires Defragging
  • From: "Larry Qualig" <lqualig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 7 Dec 2006 11:29:32 -0800
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <1394801.q35rItuLBW@schestowitz.com>
  • Injection-info: j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.130.224.20; posting-account=I0FyeA0AAABAUAjJ9vi7laKRssUBoQA3
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <1394801.q35rItuLBW@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:466177
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Top 10 disk defragging pointers
>
> ,----[ Gist ]
> | # Work it!
> | # Use your noggin.
> | # What are you waiting for?
> | # Know your disk capacity and potential disk errors.
> | # Server bottlenecks.
> | # Leave me alone!
> | # Application interference.
> | # Respect the differences.
> | # Don't rely on the built-in Windows defragger.
> | # Stay in charge.
> `----
>
> http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid5_gci888617,00.html

Written by Meredith Derby in January 2002.  In just a few weeks it will
be 2007. Man you're a pathetic troll who needs to stop digging up
5-year old stories and posing them as [News] and go out and actually
get a life.


 
> Side note:
<snip>
Nobody cares.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index