__/ [ Stacey ] on Saturday 25 February 2006 10:52 \__
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dtp8kk$r8j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> __/ [ Stacey ] on Saturday 25 February 2006 09:18 \__
>>
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:dtog9a$29k0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I never ever mentioned his name in public. Judge for yourself:
>>>
>>> You mentioned his name here in this thread. That is public. You gave
>>> links
>>> to Chris's Blog and stated you didn't mention Dave's Name. You equated
>>> Dave
>>> with Chris's Blog that way.
>>
>> Stacey,
>>
>> You know nothing bad was intended. The thread as-is does not discuss the
>> person we are currently referring. Nothing in Chris' blog or in the
>> conversations we had mentioned any names. I never even pointed him to this
>> forum either.
>
> Well making a link to the blog from here could bring it up in searches.
> This *thread* you pointed out Dave in general for blog rolls.
>
>>I feel like some kind of accusation is made here,
>
> Only to the fact you made it a point here that you were referring to Dave
> without mentioning his name or URL's. We all know that what you state here
> and with the links posted it will be connected in the SE's. Although, you
> didn't intend to say anything bad you kind of ended up doing it.
>
> I am not going to go on a spat back and forth. That is just my feelings
> about it. It could have all been done and said without bringing up his name
> here also.
>
> There is nothing wrong with someone taking over domains or blogs, or
> pointing links to all of the sites. IMO Dave was lucky to find some decent
> blogs with some good PR to get his sites linked up. Dave does not, comment
> spam(anymore) and other type of spam. He sticks to mostly white hat. Some
> are grey areas at times, but these are to his own sites and he doesn't risk
> anyone else's. People can comment all they like about this type of stuff
> being bad in their opinion. But mentioning it somewhere else in a NG and
> the person's name behind their back sounds like school yard chick
> gossip.:-)
>
> I can understand the frustration of people getting comment spam. But hey,
> you open up a bar with free drinks you will always bring the wrong crowd
> in.:-)
>
> Stacey
He used to comment spam??? Son of a f*cking bitch. There is no way in hell I
will ever forgive anyone for the equivalent of E-mail spam. Nobody on the
Internet ever will.
And that's just how I feel about it.
Roy
|
|
