__/ [ Roy Schestowitz ] on Saturday 25 February 2006 11:02 \__
> __/ [ Stacey ] on Saturday 25 February 2006 10:52 \__
>
>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:dtp8kk$r8j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> __/ [ Stacey ] on Saturday 25 February 2006 09:18 \__
>>>
>>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:dtog9a$29k0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I never ever mentioned his name in public. Judge for yourself:
>>>>
>>>> You mentioned his name here in this thread. That is public. You gave
>>>> links
>>>> to Chris's Blog and stated you didn't mention Dave's Name. You equated
>>>> Dave
>>>> with Chris's Blog that way.
>>>
>>> Stacey,
>>>
>>> You know nothing bad was intended. The thread as-is does not discuss the
>>> person we are currently referring. Nothing in Chris' blog or in the
>>> conversations we had mentioned any names. I never even pointed him to
>>> this forum either.
>>
>> Well making a link to the blog from here could bring it up in searches.
>> This *thread* you pointed out Dave in general for blog rolls.
>>
>>>I feel like some kind of accusation is made here,
>>
>> Only to the fact you made it a point here that you were referring to Dave
>> without mentioning his name or URL's. We all know that what you state here
>> and with the links posted it will be connected in the SE's. Although, you
>> didn't intend to say anything bad you kind of ended up doing it.
>>
>> I am not going to go on a spat back and forth. That is just my feelings
>> about it. It could have all been done and said without bringing up his
>> name here also.
>>
>> There is nothing wrong with someone taking over domains or blogs, or
>> pointing links to all of the sites. IMO Dave was lucky to find some decent
>> blogs with some good PR to get his sites linked up. Dave does not, comment
>> spam(anymore) and other type of spam. He sticks to mostly white hat. Some
>> are grey areas at times, but these are to his own sites and he doesn't
>> risk anyone else's. People can comment all they like about this type of
>> stuff being bad in their opinion. But mentioning it somewhere else in a NG
>> and the person's name behind their back sounds like school yard chick
>> gossip.:-)
>>
>> I can understand the frustration of people getting comment spam. But hey,
>> you open up a bar with free drinks you will always bring the wrong crowd
>> in.:-)
>>
>> Stacey
>
> He used to comment spam??? Son of a f*cking bitch. There is no way in hell
> I will ever forgive anyone for the equivalent of E-mail spam. Nobody on the
> Internet ever will.
>
> And that's just how I feel about it.
>
> Roy
As a side note and precaution, that will most definitely the last word I will
say on this topic, no matter where this thread goes, let alone if new ones
are started.
I hope you understand that none of this is directed at you, Stacey. I know
you are a decent and kind person.
|
|
