Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Recycle Bin not enough, Microsoft adds "Previous Versions" support on the file system level

  • Subject: Re: Recycle Bin not enough, Microsoft adds "Previous Versions" support on the file system level
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:32:48 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS
  • References: <1154329060.371179.277480@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <12crpe456kgds9a@news.supernews.com> <7Tlzg.54556$eQ.50256@newsfe7-win.ntli.net>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Jim ] on Monday 31 July 2006 12:32 \__

> Tim Smith wrote:
> 
>> In article <1154329060.371179.277480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Want to make sure your operating system isn't pulling any obscure or
>>> undocumented tricks behind your back?  Use Linux!
>> 
>> If Linux had this feature and Windows didn't, I bet you'd be posting how
>> it is a Linux advantage.
>> 
> TBH, I can't see the advantage. Maybe I'm just being blonde. I gotta ask
> though, how many times does one need to tell the file manager that he
> doesn't need the file anymore, that he needs the space for something else
> (think: digital video/DVD images, which takes a LOT of space)?
> I only want to tell it ONCE.
> SHIFT+DELETE (which on my Dell C840 is pretty hard to do by accident) gives
> me my space back. IFAICT, this new feature in Vista doesn't, in fact it
> uses /more/ space than the file itself to store it, hidden away somewhere.
> Not a good situation if you're doing video work on the road and you only
> have a hundred Gig drive.

Linux can achieve all of this /upon demand/. It just doesn't
do  this  by  default;  I  am not  sure  it  can  present  a
simplified  UI,  either  (albeit a day or two  with  GTK  or
Trolltech  Qt Designer can 'fix' that). I thought about this
feature  while  walking down the street. To be  honest  with
you,  that demo which shows a picture of a flower with  some
transitions  (that  which you see in various articles  about
this new feature)... I just can't see how it becomes useful.
My  mother,  for example, will only ratate an  image  90/270
degrees.  That's  the most she would do. No manipulation  of
any  kind. So why revert to old(er) versions? For text  it's
rather  impractical  for reasons I mentioned in  an  earlier
post on the subject.

The idea is neat in theory. What's to gain? To most of us --
nothing.  What's to lose: privacy; disk space;  performance;
complexity.  Vista remains "too little too late"^tm.  People
could  find  better  uses  for  a  rational   database-based
fileystem,  which  Linux  has already got (as  well  as  the
semantic  one),  unlike  Windows  Vista.  Beagle  and  other
similar tools complement this further.

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
GNU/Linux is beautiful. < http://youtube.com/watch?v=lawkc3jH3ws >
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
 12:20pm  up 11 days  0:35,  10 users,  load average: 0.67, 0.67, 0.70
      http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index