On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:14:51 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:39:36 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
>> If the lack of replies to Roy bothers you, you have four good choices
>
> Proving once again you can't fucking read. The lack of replies is merely a
> symptom of the irrelevance of the majority of his posts. If they're not
> worth commenting on, they they're not worth reading.
Is that some sort of rule you just invented? Don't be stupid, Erik. For a
start, you haven't faintest idea how many people do or do not read the
News posts in the first place. The fact they aren't beeing commented on a
great deal doesn't prove a things. And virtually the only people who have
complained about Roy's posts are trolls. That alone ought to give you a
hint.
--
Kier
|
|
