spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>> For some reason thats hard to fathom, the hardcore Roy fanatics that
>> actually think he is advocating with his unnecessary SPAM, seem sure
>> that a digest is "impractical". I'm still to fathom why this might be.
>
> Oh, it's not that.
Yes it is.
> It's just that since roy started posting, he's really got on the wintroll's
> tits cos he's drowning out their noise making them less effective.
No he hasn't : because he just gets killfiled. Don't believe me? Check
who replies to him. The same minority. And then only in a "schill" role.
>
> Really irritates you, that, doesn't it? That's why I agree with his
> postings even if I don't read 90% of them, they're serving a purpose in
> drowning you lot out.
What "lot"? What are you talking about? How does flooding a NG with OT
drivel or something about a Russian Nun installing Linux affect
anything?
--
Vini, vidi, Linux!
-- Unknown source
|
|
