Hadron Quark wrote:
"cc" <scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Buford Ressup wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:39:07 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Sunday 24 September 2006 08:10 \__
begin oe_protect.scr
Buford Ressup <buford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:26:00 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
On a slightly different note, paging back up the thread, I noticed
this Erik using the standard english construction "if it were",
rather than the
usual American "if it was"; I don't read Erik's posts usually, so
haven't seen his style for a while, but I do recall him confusing
dependent with dependant, so it seems surprising to see such a
construction, and gives the strong impression that someone else
wrote some, if not all, of that posting?
Thoughts anyone?
He's confusing it's with its, as well. I remember Erik being a bit
more literate than he's seemed, lately. Maybe he's getting senile.
:)
Ahh, perhaps :-)
There's less need to proofread when so many killfiles have the messages
eliminated.
Roy
Coming from the poster with the most errors ever, that is really funny.
Hint : try reading the articles you plagiarise before you comment on
them. You wont come across as such a mindless obsessive then.
You don't exactly understand what "plagiarise" means, do you? Let me
Yes I do. But I am using artistic license. I realise that may be a bit
over your head.
Translation: you are lying.
A) He posts chunks of them.
B) He reduces the hits the originating linkers would get thus depriving
them of royalties and hit count.
Even if your whines were true, that isn't plagiarism.
explain it simply for you. It's when you copy someone else's work and
pretend that it is your own, original work. If Roy were pasting
articles
Roy has done that in the past. Google it up.
NO, you show us where Roy has presented an article as his own that was
written by someone else.
here that he found somewhere on the web and pretending he wrote them, he
would be guilty of plagiarism. If he posts pointers to those articles,
he's pretty much just making an ongoing bibliography.
Get it now?
Yeah, didn't think so.
You didn't use punctuation Hadron understands : so he is unable to read
your post.
Very funny colon boy :)
It might be, if you weren't so pathetic.
--
Rick
|
|
