On 2007-04-08, AB <fardblossom@xxxxxxxxx> claimed:
> On 2007-04-07, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:25:38 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> Open source SplendidCRM a sweet alternative for ".Net-centric" SAAS provider
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| Now that he's gained some practical experience with an open source
>>>| application, Schepis says he'd use it again. "So long as there's
>>>| existing knowledge, or an easy way to get up to speed, there's no
>>>| difference between using open source and commercial. Actually, there's
>>>| an additional benefit, because you have access to the source and
>>>| the licensing fees are much lower. Just make sure you set your
>>>| expectations in line with the experience level of the people who
>>>| are going to implement it for you."
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.itmanagersjournal.com/feature/22363
>>
>> You are such a fucking liar, Roy. Jesus.
>
> Where did Roy lie?
I forgot. The original title of the article:
Open source SplendidCRM a sweet alternative for ".Net-centric" SAAS
provider
Certainly implies they were getting away from Dot NYET.
Here's what the company says about their own product:
SplendidCRM Software, Inc. has released SplendidCRM Professional 1.3
and SplendidCRM Open-Source 1.3, Customer Relationship Management
(CRM) applications licensed in part under the "SugarCRM Public
License 1.1.3".
http://www.splendidcrm.com/
I'll leave the rest intact just in case your ISP deleted the other one.
Like they alwyas have in the past.
> And did you find where he lied in the last one in which you called him
> a liar? I gave up on that thread because I guessed your ISP was
> deleting the posts that call you on things again. But here's another
> opportunity to correct yourself.
>
--
It's a shame Linux has such difficulty running some of the more popular
Windows applications: Nimda, CodeRed, Klez, ILOVEYOU, WPA, Swen,
SoBig, Beagle, Sober, Mydoom, NetSky, Bagle, Drivus, Randex.
|
|
