On Apr 19, 10:57 am, Maverick <S...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:
> > In article <V8WdnSrJSo8uO7vbnZ2dnUVZ_jWdn...@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Maverick <S...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>>As for how it is built, you can read about it yourself, on the
> >>>SplendidCRM website:
>
> >>> "SplendidCRM was built on the Microsoft technology stack (Windows,
> >>> IIS, SQL Server, C#, and ASP.NET)."
>
> >>>Is it your contention that the authors of SplendidCRM don't know how it
> >>>is built?
>
> >>Christ your thick. Do you really think that open source software was
> >>written using MS software? It is open source... PERIOD.
> >>You can keep lying all you want, but it won't make it come true.
>
> > So your contention is that the authors of SplendidCRM are wrong when
> > they say it is built on MS software? Could you please tell us how you
> > determined this?
>
> It isn't built using M$ software. Like Tom and I both concurred on is
> that they used Open Source tools to develop it.
By the way, I'm almost 100% sure that it was built using MS Visual
Studio. Go look at the source repository. It's got all of the Visual
Studio project files. The files all target msbuild - yep, it's vs2005
for sure.
> If you used M$
> development tools, you'd then have to pay the M$ license fees. How else
> were they going to reduce the license costs?
> Besides, the main article said as much.- Hide quoted text -
What are you talking about? The fees they were talking about were for
the crm package, and splendid comes in two vesions - a commercial and
a non-commercial. This has nothing to do with the tools it was built
with.
--
Tom Shelton
--
Tom Shelton
|
|
