Maverick <Sun@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <2325993.N6EEQRLWmA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>As I said before, the trolls nitpick and find any excuse now to attach labels
>>>to my name. Check carefully before you take the troll's word because they
>>>try to poison people's minds.
>>
>>
>> Well, if you would take the time to be accurate, and if you would
>> stop repeating stories after you are shown they are wrong, then
>> there wouldn't be any mistakes to nitpick.
>
> So it is just you then, the nitpicker, eh?
>
>>
>> You should study the feedback on your Digg comments--you could learn
>> a lot, and greatly improve yourself.
>
> You should follow your own advice, boi.
>
>> Yes, I know you think you just get dug down because a vast army of
>> shills is following you around, nailing all your comments. Think
>> about that for a moment--if that was why your comments get buried,
>> it would apply to all of your comments.
>
> It sure looks like you are a shill. Why do you follow him around?
> Did he give you a bone?
>
>>
>> However, an examination of your comments on Digg shows that the ones
>> on stories that are not popular are only dug down a small amount, if
>> at all. It is on the stories that get popular that you get those
>> spectacular -50 scores.
>>
>> That means that it is not the shills doing it. It is the general
>> Digg population that dislikes your comments. Figure out why, and
>> fix that, and you'll also improve your stories here.
>>
>
> So says timmy without any proof of accusation.
>
Please try to think. The proof is in the Digg statistics you buffoon.
--
They are most deceived that trusteth most in themselves.
|
|
