waterskidoo wrote:
William Poaster wrote:
Rick wrote:
Hadron wrote:
And his "boycott" site generates click revenue from
Google Ads.
It's all about Roy and why he plagiarizes so many links
from legitimate news distribution web sites in order to
reduce their hit count and to increase his.
And AGAIN, how do you plagiarize a link? How? A link is a
link, and it sends you to the content... content that is
plainly generated by someone else, complete with their
bylines.
You *can't*, but Quack doesn't understand what plagiarise
means.
I agree with this and still don't get what he is claiming.
http://www.sitecash.com/math.htm
It is just like the fuss the trolls were making two months ago,
of the 3 average hits a day on Roy's personal website. Revenue
generating at $0.03 US per click would have earned Roy $0.09 per
day on the average or about $2.70 US per month. At $3 US per
month or $36 US (18 quid) per year, his charitable earning was a
mountain out of a molehill.
This is assuming that a reader actually clicks on the ads. If he
had 100 hits a day and 3% of the readers clicked on an ad would
generate $0.09 US/day x 365 days/year = $32.80 US/year.
The plagiarise rant is just more trollspeak.
--
HPT
|
|
