Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> ____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 28 August 2007 19:00 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> ____/ [H]omer on Saturday 18 August 2007 12:40 : \____
>>>
>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>>>>
>>>>> Who am I replying to that is also a troll?
>>>>
>>>> Bailo is back on the Troll list. I don't know whether or not to keep
>>>> him there; he's up and down like a yo-yo.
>>>
>>> That's what I suspected. He's not harmful and he stopped that Novell
>>> stock rah-rah a couple of months ago. :-)
>>>
>>
>> He's always been unpredictable here... much better than he was, though.
>> I was on the verge of dropping him from my kfile.
>
> I was once told that he had been accused of bad behviour long before I
> subscribed to COLA (late 2005).
>
Bailo was *the* nymshifter par excellence
At one point he used several nyms *per* *day*
And each and every post of him was pure, unadultered garbage
The last point at least hasn't changed very much
Bailo is still an imbecile. And he was the one who dragged that rabid
lunatic Relf into cola and did his utmost to keep that twit here
Kier with his Snot-loving affair was just a beginner/apprentice compared to
Bailo
--
The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them
to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
|
|
