On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:13:47 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Kier wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:12:17 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
>>> There is no Waterskidoo. It's Gary. So now you're sort of attacking me
>>> and defending flatfish, but it's just because you haven't read enough
>>> posts to know what I know for a fact.
>>
>> No, I'm not defending flatfish, and no, you don't know it for a fact. The
>> most you've got is a strong suspicion.
>>
>> Ever though that seeing flatfish under every stone, like Reds under every
>> bed, merely plays right into his hands?
>>
>
> Well, flatbrain certainly is the one who is trying to be under every stone.
> Look up the posts from "mr.macfeelme". They appeared in this group
> immedeately before "flatfish" resurfaced.
>
> Same style. Same dishonesty. And same IP-address. All of them. And all of
> flatfishs post.
>
> He *does* nymshift. A lot. And often enough, he slips and makes errors which
> *prove* that he /again/ nymshifted.
Which I've never denied happens. But my arguement is still the same.
Seeing flatty under every stone merely plays into his hands. That's why I
ignore, mostly, types like mr.macfeelme.
>
>
> "Waterskidoo", "Attila" and "Simon Lewis" are equally the same person. Quite
> probably there are more nyms. I have better things to do than checking
> them. I just take note of those which I happen to find "by accident".
>
> And yes, those are /probably/ also flatfish nyms.
The latter two, yes, I'd agree, are probably flatty - not waterskidoo. If
there's really any proof, let's see it.
--
Kier
|
|
