-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:40:42 -0500,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:26:50 GMT, Linonut wrote:
>
>> Ever wonder why OK keeps posting the Netcraft survey?
>
> You never could trust Netcraft, because it's numbers don't say what people
> keep insisting they do.
>
> ie. they don't equal market share, yet Linux advocates (probably even
> yourself) have long trumpeted these numbers as gospel. Suddenly, when you
> don't like them, despite the fact the methodology hasn't changed, then they
> can't be trusted.
>
> Hardy har har. The chicken has come home to roost.
>
>> Other explanations include the domain parking crap, IIS server
>> riding on the popularity of Sharepoint and BusinessServices, a huge
>> upswing of Visual Studio developers shifting from desktop to web apps
>> (ASP.net), ...
>
> Domain parking is completely negated by Netcraft's "active sites"
> benchmark, which still show IIS growing and apache shrinking.
Make up your mind, are netcraft's numbers valid or not?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG0M9sd90bcYOAWPYRAunjAJ9itZIblQXQFhoQ+8JiEFuPeZ+8WwCgk28/
WCjGknO0ompWnodPhpjc6Bg=
=eLDZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
This isn't hell. This is where you get sent when you've been bad in hell.
|
|
