dapunka wrote:
>To extend this discussion a little - yesterday I saw a post saying
>that the "RealBasic" thing for Linux was good, offered an alternative
>to VisualBasic etc. What I'm wondering is: Is RealBasic any good for
>coding? Back in the 80s BASIC was a bit of a joke - not a proper
>programming language and so on. Is this RealBasic truly useful?
Of course it is. Go to their Web site and read about it. It's a
modern language and it's got everything you need to write structured
programs.
|
|
