On Jul 4, 10:13 am, canadafred <canadian_...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 3:12 am, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > ____/ canadafred on Tuesday 03 July 2007 15:52 : \____
>
> > > On Jul 2, 11:23 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >> > As far as grammar is concerned, the search engines are evolving to
> > >> > employ the natural use of the language. Grammar has a role and will
> > >> > play an increasingly more vital role in determining content
> > >> > credibility and authenticity.
>
> > >> I doubt it. The computer power needed to do this is enormous and it's a hard
> > >> problem (if not impossible) to solve. Multiply this by the number of pages
> > >> on the WWW.
>
> > > SEs use stemming, pluralization, synonyms etc. in factoring content
> > > relevance.
>
> > True, but I don't think they descend to the level of grammar and semantics.
>
> Euphemisms are a couple of good examples of what I mean by proper
> grammar.
>
> "SEO" and "Search Engine Optimization", "Expert" and "Specialist"
>
> --
>
> Fred
>
> http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Punctuation, hyphenation, capitaliztion ... emphasizing ...
|
|
