Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Wednesday 31 October 2007 08:36 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Wednesday 31 October 2007 06:50 : \____
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Tuesday 30 October 2007 21:54 : \____
>>>>>
>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Monday 29 October 2007 13:32 : \____
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Monday 29 October 2007 10:41 : \____
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> < snip >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think there was an open test version (several even,
>>>>>>>>>>> distributed via Torrent). How come nobody spotted this conflict
>>>>>>>>>>> before the release?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because apple changed so much between the last RC and the gold
>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> < snip >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or maybe no-one was willing to be the slave (tester) of a
>>>>>>>>> multi-billion dollar company that is so arrogant...?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you actually try sometimes to generate some coherent thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be specific, Peter. You're being rude.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you actually think that assuming that apple has no beta testers is
>>>>>> amounting to something "coherent"?
>>>>>> It certainly has nothing to do with "thought", and even less
>>>>>> with "intelligence"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact, it is a sign of a stupidity until now only cretins like
>>>>>> "linux-sux" or OxRetard exhibited
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So stop this display of being a dimwit and start to use what you have
>>>>>> got as a "brain", as useless as it may be
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider the fact that hundreds of Linux distributions have testers
>>>>> who identify bugs in separate /packages/ and the fixes go upstream.
>>>>> There is a lot going on in terms of feedback and it's fast. Mac OS X
>>>>> is not modular in the sense that it comes in just a single form and
>>>>> public testers have no access to the code.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can't even stick to a simple discussion.
>>>> This wasn't about "OSX not being modular" or "access to code"
>>>>
>>>> It was about it having beta testers or not. You assumed it does not,
>>>> as "apple found no slave testers"
>>>>
>>>> Idiot
>>>>
>>>> You are not a tiny little bit better than flatfish. Or OxRetard
>>>
>>> No, you were just being unspecific with your accusation.
>>>
>>
>> So yes, you are an idiot
>>
>>> Had you politely pointed out the problem you were having with my
>>> arguments, my response would have been more satisfactory.
>>
>> Like your last one?
>>
>> By now you've lost nearly all my respect. I have difficulties to regard
>> you as a poster whose opinions I would consider. Same as Mark Kent, BTW
>>
>> He too has lost all credibility in my book
>>
>> Too bad. You both started with good intentions. And now you both are just
>> screeching GPL3-jihadis, without coherent thought worth mentioning
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Read the following new essay.
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1003745
>
This has what to do with *your* inability to post something coherent
exactly?
Why on earth can't you stick to a discussion and instead throw in fluff
which has nothing to do with it?
Tell you what, return to your glue bag. I suspect that a few surviving
braincells need "treatment"
--
Just out of curiosity does this actually mean something or have some
of the few remaining bits of your brain just evaporated?
|
|
