____/ Peter Köhlmann on Wednesday 31 October 2007 08:36 : \____
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Wednesday 31 October 2007 06:50 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Tuesday 30 October 2007 21:54 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Monday 29 October 2007 13:32 : \____
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Monday 29 October 2007 10:41 : \____
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> < snip >
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think there was an open test version (several even, distributed
>>>>>>>>>> via Torrent). How come nobody spotted this conflict before the
>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because apple changed so much between the last RC and the gold code
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> < snip >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or maybe no-one was willing to be the slave (tester) of a
>>>>>>>> multi-billion dollar company that is so arrogant...?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you actually try sometimes to generate some coherent thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Be specific, Peter. You're being rude.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you actually think that assuming that apple has no beta testers is
>>>>> amounting to something "coherent"?
>>>>> It certainly has nothing to do with "thought", and even less
>>>>> with "intelligence"
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, it is a sign of a stupidity until now only cretins like
>>>>> "linux-sux" or OxRetard exhibited
>>>>>
>>>>> So stop this display of being a dimwit and start to use what you have
>>>>> got as a "brain", as useless as it may be
>>>>
>>>> Consider the fact that hundreds of Linux distributions have testers who
>>>> identify bugs in separate /packages/ and the fixes go upstream. There is
>>>> a lot going on in terms of feedback and it's fast. Mac OS X is not
>>>> modular in the sense that it comes in just a single form and public
>>>> testers have no access to the code.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You can't even stick to a simple discussion.
>>> This wasn't about "OSX not being modular" or "access to code"
>>>
>>> It was about it having beta testers or not. You assumed it does not,
>>> as "apple found no slave testers"
>>>
>>> Idiot
>>>
>>> You are not a tiny little bit better than flatfish. Or OxRetard
>>
>> No, you were just being unspecific with your accusation.
>>
>
> So yes, you are an idiot
>
>> Had you politely pointed out the problem you were having with my
>> arguments, my response would have been more satisfactory.
>
> Like your last one?
>
> By now you've lost nearly all my respect. I have difficulties to regard you
> as a poster whose opinions I would consider. Same as Mark Kent, BTW
>
> He too has lost all credibility in my book
>
> Too bad. You both started with good intentions. And now you both are just
> screeching GPL3-jihadis, without coherent thought worth mentioning
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read the following new essay.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1003745
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Data lacking semantics is currency in an island
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 2.74 2.14 1.66 1/146 14447
http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
|
|
