Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:25:16 -0700,
> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In article <JnILj.21683$9O.10885@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> As far as Roy summarizing articles incorrectly, I've already spoken my
>>> piece. But, one more time. He goes too fast in posting them, and that
>>> is a recognized weakness. Be prepared to deal with it. It's not like I
>>> haven't told you over and over about it.
>>
>> A few times can be excused as a mistake due to being sloppy. But that
>> excuse doesn't work when it happens over and over again for months or
>> years. If it were just a mistake, and he actually wanted to present
>> accurate information, he'd correct the behavior that leads to the
>> mistakes.
>
>
> well, we've been saying that for years, but Erik hasn't changed
> behaviour yet.
>
Indeed not, nor is he likely to, in my view.
The article is correct, though, as is the headline. This particular
update does damage the MBR in some way.
--
| mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| Open platforms prevent vendor lock-in. Own your Own services! |
|
|
