-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:52:45 +0100,
Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>>>> Someone like you, who doesn't even know the difference between
>>>>> PCI-X and PCI Express
>> [...]
>>>> Huh? I recall correcting some else here on that. And if not then it
>>>> was typoville.
>>
>> So you are now claiming that this was a typo?:
>>
>> .----
>> | 'Also, no one calls it PCI-X even though that's the "official "
>> | shortening of the much more commonly used "PCI Express".'
>> `----
>>
>> Yeah, right.
>>
>> You're an idiot, face it.
>
> "no one calls it PCI-X"
>
> And note the "offical" in brackets you moron.
>
> Oh hang on, was it you I spanked? I think it was.
Except that PCI-X and PCI Express are not the same thing. Not in name,
and not in spec. PCI-E/PCI Express is a standard that *replaces* PCI-X
(among others)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHjAZod90bcYOAWPYRAuslAKDCXIcaKloVIc1WAIwRM1BPBNy26QCgrTtn
R995+u0kzYSDfVAhAEo+A6E=
=QlK0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
In questions of science the authority of a thousand is not worth the
humble reasoning of a single individual.
--Galileo
|
|
