Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:qo7ia5-c6b.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote:
>
>> Oh, you mean like Micro$oft did with their "Get the Facts"
>> campaign...yeah, that was factually correct, wasn't it.
>> And like Micro$oft's ads, that were pulled by the UK Advertising
>> Standards Authority:
>> http://www.cxolinux.com/linux/jsp/article.jsp?article_id=1393&cat_id=12
>> 02 And also by the South African Advertising Standards Authority:
>> http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/business/2003/0303201315.asp?S=Software
>> &A=SFT&O=FPMS
>
> So you are saying that the information I have provided is false?
You have spun well for your paymasters, however, nobody, anywhere, is
remotely convinced that you are acting for anything other than the
interests of Microsoft in your efforts to corrupt ISO, to push a
standard through on fast-track which is clearly not only widely
unsupported but so immature as to be next to worthless.
We *know* that Microsoft could easily implement ODF it it wanted.
We *know* that Microsoft will "innovate" beyond OOXML anyway.
We *know* that OOXML in its present form is utterly incomplete and
unusable.
>
>> Good. Now push off.
>
> Strange ... :o)
>
Not really, you are here pushing the agenda of Microsoft. Just like
you've been doing in ISO.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|
