Snit <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "owl" <owl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post r8asr.04qr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
> 11/28/08 5:55 PM:
>
>> Snit <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> "owl" <owl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post 89502qwas.9r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
>>> 11/27/08 4:52 PM:
>>>
>>>> Snit <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> "Ezekiel" <Zeke@xxxxx> stated in post ggl0pb$el0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
>>>>> 11/26/08 7:31 PM:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora_10&num=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I looked at those screen shots and there's absolutely nothing in any of
>>>>>> those screen shots that impresses me the least bit. It's a bunch of very
>>>>>> plain windows with a blue wallpaper. The desktop icons (Trash, Computer,
>>>>>> Home, etc) are all incredibly plain and boring. If it's the 'eye candy' in
>>>>>> the screen shots that's supposed to wow users then they've missed their
>>>>>> mark.
>>>>>
>>>>> The folders are very similar to OS X folders. Who had that "look" first?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Xerox_8010_compound_document.jpg
>>>>
>>> I am talking about not just having a folder icon with the tab on the left -
>>> which has been done for a long time. I am talking about the fact the two
>>> use a similar shade of blue and have darker markings on them to
>>> differentiate them. I really do not know - has Fedora had this for a while?
>>> If so it is possible Apple was inspired by this and then just made their
>>> folders look a bit more professionally done (and, if you look closely, made
>>> their folders out of speckled, "recycled" paper)
>>>
>>
>> You are out to lunch.
>>
> You see no similarity?
>
Ponder this: " "
|
|
