On 2008-10-26, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:55:45 -0500, Sinister Midget wrote:
>> So, why slam Roy in your subject rewrite? You admit he didn't write it.
>>
>> Yeah, I know. I snipped the part where you said he knows it's deceit,
>> and that makes him an accomplice. But that's only your opinion.
>>
>> Unless you're willing to share your "proof".
>
> Roy likes to use weasel words to insinuate a position without actually
> saying it, then when called on it claims he didn't say that was the case,
> so he can pretend to justify not issuing a correction.
Should I consider the assessment of "weaseling" to be an authoritative?
But I /do/ note that you're stating more opinion rather than answering
the question or addressing the issue directly.
> Roy knows how slimy his tatctics are. At least you admit here to removing
> the context
Just as I thought. No proof, just more opinion.
--
Are you scared of speed? Then try Windows.
|
|
