After takin' a swig o' grog, Sinister Midget belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> On 2008-10-26, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> Roy likes to use weasel words to insinuate a position without actually
>> saying it, then when called on it claims he didn't say that was the case,
>> so he can pretend to justify not issuing a correction.
>
> Should I consider the assessment of "weaseling" to be an authoritative?
Heh heh
My own take is that, in a hurry to post, pretty much everyone here
misses some key fact or makes some misstatement.
In a normal place, follow-on conversation would correct it in a civil
manner.
--
Why did the Roman Empire collapse? What is the Latin for office automation?
|
|