Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <86ocv9bkqp.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Mart van de Wege <mvdwege_public@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> Gosh. Microsoft holds patents that TomTom may infringe upon. Instead of
>> >> >> privately notifying TomTom, they immediately drag them into court.
>
> The above is what *you* said, Mart. Are you retracting it?
Partly.
You are trying to fuzz up the discussion. It's very simple: both
Microsoft and TomTom had patents the other was infringing. Microsoft
sued first. That makes Microsoft the aggressor.
But hey, trust a Microsoft whore like you to try and argue semantics to
make anything MS does look good. You're a good little Erik pupil. Here's
a cookie. Now FOAD.
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
|
|
