Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <861vs6xpn4.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Mart van de Wege <mvdwege_public@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > In article <86iqliydro.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> > Mart van de Wege <mvdwege_public@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Gosh. Microsoft holds patents that TomTom may infringe upon. Instead of
>> >> privately notifying TomTom, they immediately drag them into court.
>> >
>> > Microsoft notified TomTom over a year before filing suit, and tried to
>> > get TomTom to negotiate a license. You consider that "immediately"?
>>
>> TomTom notified Microsoft around that same time, and didn't file suit.
>>
>> Now who is threatening who?
>>
>> Using MS software apparently rots the brain.
>
> So you are a heavy Microsoft software user--that's your excuse for being
> wrong when you claimed MS did not notify TomTom of the alleged
> infringement well before suing?
Uhm no.
There's one party in this dispute who did sue, and it wasn't TomTom.
You really are stupid, aren't you?
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
|
|
