On 2009-01-30, Sermo Malifer <sermomalifer@xxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Sermo Malifer wrote:
>>> I don't see any outright lying here, just a difference of opinion.
>> The analysis he was answering to (about IE flaws) had only serious
>> security flaws taken into account.
> According to each company's definition of what is a serious security
> flaw on their own software. IOW, a difference of opinion.
>> He either shares the wintendo users inability to read and understand
>> rather simple things (which is abundantly shown in COLA) or he was quite
>> disengenious, if not to say, outright dishonest
> Or he wasn't as generous as Mozilla authors were in rating risks on
> their own software.
Same ol' snot. Can't read very well.
Do you know why Windows' "last known good configuration" almost never
works? Because the last known good configuration was a blank disk.