On Jun 22, 9:40 pm, Gregory Shearman <ZekeGreg...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2009-06-23, wispygalaxy <wispygal...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Jun 19, 8:21 pm, "DFS" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> wispygalaxy wrote:
> >> > It's sad that corporate people are so lazy that they don't bother to
> >> > research better software solutions. They think that if you pay for
> >> > software, it's better.
>
> >> well duh... that's because it almost always is better.
>
> > So you think that paying more for something guarantees better
> > quality? So, why did my little sister's Old Navy flip-flops last much
> > longer than her Abercrombie and Fitch flip-flops? She's not even
> > rough or careless with her shoes. She paid $35 for the A&F shoes and
> > only $2.50 for her Old Navy ones. The A&F flip flops broke two weeks
> > after she got them, and the strap snapped off. And her Old Navy flip
> > flops, which she bought a couple of years ago, are still sitting on
> > the shoe rack to this day.
>
> > I know I'm using shoes as an example, but you get the idea.
>
> Shoes are fine. Cars are not.
:-)
|
|
