Richard Rasker wrote:
> rat wrote:
>>
>> Richard Rasker wrote:
>>>
>>> These shenanigans once again show that the bastards from Redmond are
>>> never to be trusted.
>>
>> Rather this kind of thing once again shows the very superficial effort
>> being extended for these "open" standards.
>
>The funny thing is that Microsoft is the only one making this "very
>superficial effort" you mention. All other parties who implemented ODF at
>least did their best to get it right. Actually "superficial effort" is way
>too much credit for these assholes -- they deliberately try to bury ODF by
>doing the worst job imaginable, then whine about how the standard is total
>crap. And have their lap dogs yapping to the same tune. QED.
Well, let's face it - ODF is not in the interest of Micro$oft, and,
with their market dominance, they are in excellent position to
obstruct and restrain its use. It matters not that it's good for the
customer, it's bad for Micro$oft.
--
'Which "open standard" formats would these be? The ones that are still
non standard or the MS Office ones which are used in 95% or more of
businesses?' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
|
|
