Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:17:16 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Building a business selling open-source software
>
> "There are two types of people, those who will spend money
> to save time, and those who will spend time to save money.
> Striking a balance is important for any open-source company
> getting into one of the new markets now emerging on line."
>
>
> IOW Linux and FOSS is free as long as your time has little
> value.
Bingo! Thats the raylope theory of TCO!!!
Flying out to Bangkok to buy a 50 pirated windump CD
so that you can install it cheaper because flights,
food, hotel expenses, taxi and piracy are not
part of TCO studies.
How stupid do windump TCO claims get?
Your time is precious and Linux time is even more
precious than windump time. It pays 50% extra!
That is the commercial reality.
More reasons to switch to become Linux developer
as there is near vacuum for Linux engineers everywhere.
They are gold dust.
Micoshaft names RHAT and Canonical (Ubuntu) as their enemies!!!
---------------------------------------------------------------
BEAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
They got nothin better to do?
I'm thinking about that RHAT advert...
First they laugh at us
Then they fight us
Then we win
So we are now at stage 2 where micoshaft is picking a fight
by naming RHAT and Canonical (Ubuntu) as their enemies.
A few days earlier they named Intel and HP as enemies too.
And Google? - yet another enemy that has destroyed
a large chunk of micoshaft already.
Looks like micoshaft is catching its death from all around.
And only a few days ago micoshaft's Balmer claimed micoshaft
has been fighting Linux for YEARS!!!!
Thats despite all the trolls.
Verbosity makes things unclear.
Either Balmer is lying, or the windummy trolls are lying
or both are liars as Linux continues its meteoric rise
and micoshaft revenue heads south.
Windummy paytard loons all thrown into the trollard soup after
years of lying about Micoshaft claiming it doesn't care about
Linux or that Linux is too insignificant when it was
the exact opposite.
As micoshaft sales have lost 30% of market.
how does micoshaft define competing with Linux?
It can't be anything serious.
All we see here are a bunch of windummy trolls ranting
anti-Linux slogans.
Is that what micoshaft calls competing with Linux?
Is that how they lost 30% market share to Linux?
I am sure all reporters, journalists, bloggers,
Linux engineers, and big bosses of big companies
would all like to know now what Balmer meant by
competing with Linux. Please define.
|
|
