On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:46:32 -0400, DFS wrote:
> Rick wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:44:53 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:27:44 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <1469071.hQF4hPA7EK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Vista 7 is a piece of insecure, incompatible, bloated -POS- variant
>>>>> of Vista. Wait and watch how it fails in the market, despite
>>>>> Microsoft's PR/AstroTurf that'll strive to conceal it.
>>>>
>>>> Care to define "fails in the market"? Or do you need to leave some
>>>> wiggle wrong so you won't look utterly idiot six months from now,
>>>> when some of us come back to check on your prediction?
>>>
>>> Windows 7 is going to trounce Linux.
>>>
>>> I'm on record as stating Vista would tank, it sort of did but Windows
>>> 7 is no Vista despite the FUD that the Linux community is trying to
>>> spread.
>>
>> ... it "sort of" did? Did it, or did it not? And what was -your-
>> criteria?
>
> From my perspective: it got bad reviews and hurt MS's reputation, but
> still sold well and gained around 24% market share in 2 years. SP1
> redeemed it, I think, but too late.
>
> So it "sort of tanked". Got it, (p)Rick?
Look, kiindergarten boy tries to make a point, but only shows his
elementary school immaturity.
--
Rick
|
|
