Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Schestowitz problem solved -- mha

  • Subject: Re: Schestowitz problem solved -- mha
  • From: "asj" <kalim1998@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 22 Jul 2006 17:01:19 -0700
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <Yupwg.102$S_1.11@trndny05>
  • Injection-info: m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.232.117.20; posting-account=2SNXkgwAAABm6kAlcXuvGCvkJMcTwaRH
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <3niwg.96$jV.57@trndny09><pan.2006.07.22.11.42.21.983311@brad.net> <Yupwg.102$S_1.11@trndny05>
  • User-agent: G2/0.2
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1131373
you use outlook. end of story.

PLONK

* Seeing my appetite dissolve at Panera in Edison,NJ while avoiding all
the BS flung by 'Martha.'

We got plusmo.com

Martha Adams wrote:
> Gee, we're a little off topic.  "Plonk" is mysterious, but I get it now:
> it's the sound of a large overripe fruit falling onto the ground for
> purpose to fertilize it.  Very helpful.  Very appropriate.
>
> Anyhow, yes, I do find Outlook Express hard to use.  I found trn
> *much* nicer to use, before someone made it more "user friendly",
> several years ago.
>
> My introduction to all this stuff was ITS, leading to my private
> ambition to make a Linux run like ITS.  I've thought maybe I could
> do that with one of the little linuxes, which seem to run to gooeys
> and "user-friendly".  I think that at my age, probably I won't get
> to that.
>
> As I look at today's COLA I'm struck by the immediate improvement
> with Shestowitz out of it.  I am not saying the guy's postings are
> useless; just that it's very nice to see that stuff filtered and at
> second hand, rather than in my face.  Yes, this is much better.
>
> As for using Outlook Express here, why not?  For me, it's a way
> station, serving until I reconstitute one of my Linux machines and
> my home, so that I can set in some network resources.  And, of
> course, the best Linux firewall I can make.
>
> Cheers -- Martha Adams
>
>
> "Brad" <brad@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.07.22.11.42.21.983311@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 05:06:07 +0000, Martha Adams wrote:
> >
> >> The Schestowitz problem is basically, that spinning off posts like
> >> a July 4 pinwheel, Schestowitz must be incredibly active and
> >> productive; or, he's not accomplishing so much after all because
> >> his posts are shallow, trivial, and repeat information available
> >> in better form elsewhere.  Obviously, for Schestowitz, the
> >> second option is the one in effect.  The remedy is simple and
> >> while I believe almost anybody here can do it easily, I'll
> >> outline it anyway.  I'm working presently in Microsoft Outlook
> >> Express.
> >>
> >> Click on Tools at the top of the window; choose Message
> >> Rules, choose Block Senders List.  Probably it will be empty.
> >> Now add 'newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', into the window
> >> there.  Schestowitz isn't sending me any emails, so I chose
> >> the option, 'News Messages.'
> >
> > Hmmm, the above process is for blocking (plonking) a usenet poster in
> > MS
> > Outlook Express. A quick header check confirms this. This could lead
> > one
> > to conclude that you Martha, are nothing more than a wintroll, posting
> > to
> > a Linux newsgroup.
> > The process to accomplish this in the Linux based usenet newsreader
> > Pan is
> > this:
> > Click on <Articles>, Click on <Plonk Author>, be sure and check <Never
> > Expire>, Click on <Add and Rescore>
> >
> > And Lo, no more Martha Adams. Now COLA is a much better place.
> > Goodbye Martha Adams.
> >
> > PLONK
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index