begin oe_protect.scr
William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on Thu, 14 Sep 2006
> 20:26:16 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on Wed, 13 Sep 2006
>>> 18:56:42 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>> I started aggressively filtering about 2-3 years ago, previously, I
>>>> used to "sin-bin" some posters, for a month, but after a while, I
>>>> realised that I was just doing them again and again, so I just do it
>>>> more permanently now :-)
>>>
>>> Are you using Leafnode?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, I use leafnode and mutt. Leafnode can filter on all headers, as you
>> know, and so does for kman and his ilk. Mutt is pretty good, has regex
>> support, and can filter for periods of time (which I don't really do any
>> more), and is perhaps a tiny bit easier to play with.
>
> Ok, Mark. Roy asked me a question about kf'ing trolls & people's replies
> to trolls, *without* kf'ing their other posts. Based on what he uses in
> knode, I think I've come up with a solution for Leafnode filters, & I've
> been testing some of them for a day or so. So far it seems to be
> succesful, as I'm not seeing any of the trolls posts *nor* any replies
> people make to them. However I still get their non-troll posts.
> I *may* also have a solution which could be used with knode (perhaps slrn
> too), though as I've used Leafnode for a few years I'm somewhat rusty on
> setting their filters.
>
Sounds very interesting - I've thought about this a few times, but
couldn't see how to do it. Could you post your idea, or perhaps email
it to me (see below)?
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward,
then we are a sorry lot indeed."
-- Albert Einstein
|
|
