On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:29:02 +0100, Hadron wrote:
> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:30:13 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:25:04 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:46:29 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ____/ Kier on Sunday 25 November 2007 13:05 : \____
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:00:10 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It never ceases to amaze me how many people blindly accept, defend and even
>>>>>>>>> encourage some of the most broken, corrupt, and unethical things that we
>>>>>>>>> have ruining our **world** (not just the human race, aka "society"). And you
>>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not defending it. Please stop putting words in my mouth, Roy. Of
>>>>>>>> course it's bad and should be stopped. Just not by the methods described
>>>>>>>> in the original post, which helps no one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, Kier, if I misinterpreted or misrepresented. I wasn't my intention.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Roy. Apology accepted :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh boy....
>>>>
>>>> You're a real prick, aren't you? Roy has the decency to apologise, and all
>>>> you can do is sneer because I have the manners to thank him.
>>>>
>>>> And somehow, you're supposed to be superior to all of us?
>>>
>>> You seem to think I think I am superior. And yet William Poaster
>>
>> No, I don't. Far from it. But the way you lord it about in here,
>> proclaiming how inferior we're all supposed to be suggests you think
>> you're better than we are.
>
> Kier, you seem to think I am. You keep repeating that. But I will let
Wrong again. *YOU* think you are. I think you're dickhead.
> you into a little secret. I do think I know more about SW than a lot of
> the "advocates here". Just a little mind you.
So what? By the standards of some advocates here, you are dumber than a
stump.
>
>>
>>> boastnig about his filters and how it "all works for him" isn't? Chrisv
>>
>> What does that have to do with my having manners enough to thank someone
>> when he apologises to me?
>
> Because Roy's apologies was as shallow as 7s IQ.
At least he made one. That's more than you can do.
>
>>
>>> calling people "fuckwits" and *plonk*ing them isn't? Roy telling us all
>>> how we should recognise how MS are evil isn't? Peter calling people
>>> "Dumb shit Windows Users" isn't?
>>
>> Show me where I ever agreed with chrisv. I've disagreed with Roy's
>> attitudes on many occasions, and with Peter.
>
> Quite the little loner aren't you?
Are you cracked? You accuse me of ignoring other posters bad behaviour, I
point out I have many times disagreed with said bad behaviour, and you
make a stupid remark about me. HOw does that make you smart in any way?
>
>>
>>>
>>> You need to recalibrate your paranoia meter. Remember the "COLA
>>> advocates" all think you are a troll too.
>>
>> I am not paranoid, so you assertion is foolish. And not all the advocates
>> think any such thing about me. And you're still a prick for sneering.
>
> I'm not sneering. I am laughing. There is a big difference.
See, there you go again acting like you think you're soooo superior. Which
you are not. Just a sneering prick.
--
Kier
|
|
