Hadron wrote:
> Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> ____/ Peter Köhlmann on Wednesday 23 January 2008 12:30 : \____
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>> < snip >
>>
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>> | Microsoft’s recent history on patents (particularly since the Novell
>>>>> | deal in November 06) has a particularly public persona:
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith and licensing chief Horacio
>>>>> | Gutierrez sat down with Fortune recently to map out their strategy
>>>>> | for getting FOSS users to pay royalties. - Fortune
>>>>> |
>>>>> | “Novell pays us some money for the right to tell customers that
>>>>> | anybody who uses SuSE Linux is appropriately covered,” Ballmer
>>>>> | said...
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> http://brendanscott.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/more-on-the-osp/
>>>>>
>>>>> More quotes there. It's not a secret, it's a reality. Ignoring it
>>>>> won't make it magically go away.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So when Ballmer utters his shite about Novell, it gets somewhat
>>>> magically true. Otherwise it is, and stays, just bullshit and FUD
>>>>
>>>> Nice
>>>
>>> *This* we agree on Peter. It's bullshit and FUD. But even people outside
>>> Microsoft seem to suggest it's true. That includes Jeremy Allison.
>>>
>>
>> So, in short: You don't have a shred of evidence regarding Novell
>>
>> It just "seems to be true". And I don't care the tiniest little bit who
>> is "included" or not.
>>
>> I have asked you several times by now to post evidence, not your (or even
>> worse, Mark Kents) idiocy.
>>
>> I note that you are unable to do so. You just have "seems so"
>>
>> Dishonest asshole
>
> A post of Peter's which is on the ball. Well done.
Well, Roy may be a dishonest asshole, it certainly "seems so"
And he is nearly angelic compared to you swine
--
Windows isn't unstable. It's spontaneous.
|
|
