After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:25:20 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> I don't like what Roy did; it sounded out-of-character. I hope it is just
>> an aberration. We'll see.
> No, it just proves that Roy is no different from those he claims to abhor.
> That he participates in, and condones the very things he accuses others of.
I wouldn't talk, "Out 'em!" boy.
> It doesn't matter anyways, Roy has proven much of this by his actions in
> the past. Willfully disregarding copyright, Accusing others of things
> which are patently untrue, and when confronted with facts that refute his
> claims refusing to retract them. And of course, willfully disregarding
> anything which doesn't agree with his view of reality.
> No, thi is not "out-of-character". It's just the first opportunity he's
> had to do something like this. That's all.
So what's your take on the "Roy's testicles" stories?
<Knghtbrd> Feanor - license issues are important. If we don't watch our
arses now, someone's gonna come up and bite us later...