DFS wrote:
> Sinister Midget wrote:
>> On 2009-03-11, Peter K�hlmann <peter-koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>>> DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sinister Midget wrote:
>>>>> On 2009-03-11, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> claimed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why Microsoft has chosen to go after Linux now
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>>> But if any Microsoft employee went to a free software or open
>>>>>>> source conference today, I doubt he or she would attract
>>>>>>> anything other than hostile glares. By suing GPS device maker
>>>>>>> TomTom over alleged violation of patents connected with an
>>>>>>> implementation of the Linux kernel any goodwill that Microsoft
>>>>>>> has built up has gone down the drain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not to mention the last bit of hokey crap Erik had that MICROS~1
>>>>> was just a poor, misunderstood company that we should all love and
>>>>> respect because they never have or would sue over patents.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure you'll be providing proof of this any day now...
>>
>> I don't plan on making a habit of this, Doofie. But once in awhile is
>> OK I suppose. It only takes one to answer you. But:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.windows-
xp/msg/e77d232a5bea44b2?hl=en
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e283d9402524aab7?hl=en
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bc30372a78d064be?hl=en
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/706ab409d4941298?hl=en
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cfc1b76758faf5d6?hl=en
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f86774b095ba9914?hl=en
>>
>> There now. That wasn't so hard. It took me less than 5 minutes. It
>> shouldn't take a highly-paid, in-demand, full-qualified burger-flipper
>> like you more than an hour.
>>
>>> Erik has claimed that bullshit often enough.
>>> His claim was always that MS would use patents only as protection,
>>> not to start ligitation. As usual, Erik was either completely wrong
>>> or outright lying.
>>> But then, nobody with half a brain believed his crap then
>>
>> That's why DuFuS would fall for it. He has less than half a brain.
>
> And still you lusers got it wrong. Erik wasn't wrong or lying, at all.
> He relied on statements made by Microsoft.
And because he was stupid enough to buy that crap from MS, we should
believe *his* garbage?
Face it, DumbFullShit: Erik F has *often* told us that MS would *never* go
after others with patent claims. He was either extremely stupid, outright
lying or just wrong as usual. Why did he feel the need to post such
obvious bullshit? Nobody except you wintendo fanbois believed it then, and
yet he repeated it. Often
--
You are a shining example for the advances in artificial stupidity
|
|
