-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ GreyCloud on Monday 11 Jan 2010 00:41 : \____
> Mark Kent wrote:
>> GreyCloud <mist@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> ____/ GreyCloud on Thursday 07 Jan 2010 18:12 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ____/ GreyCloud on Thursday 07 Jan 2010 06:56 : \____
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ____/ GreyCloud on Tuesday 05 Jan 2010 22:59 : \____
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ____/ Mark Kent on Monday 04 Jan 2010 12:16 : \____
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> nessuno <nessuno7491@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 3, 12:42 pm, Mark Kent <mark.k...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Homer <use...@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have the best legislators money can buy!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, excuse me whilst I render unto Caesar what is Caesar's....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought Emperor Obama usurped Caesar in a slaves' rebellion?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Obama must be the first man in history whose first
>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant internationally impacting act *after* receiving the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobel Peace Prize was to send 30,000 troups into a foreign
>>>>>>>>>>>>> country.
>>>>>>>>>>>> He didn't ask for the Nobel prize. I don't think he wanted it.
>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't think that you could ask for one, and I certainly wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>> have awarded this one had I had the choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think that the Nobel prize has been permanently undervalued by
>>>>>>>>>>> this precipitous and ill-advised move.
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe time will tell. It's the military industrial complex sending
>>>>>>>>>> these troops; Obama is hopeless when it comes to making decisions at
>>>>>>>>>> the macro level -- those he would deliberately avoid discussing
>>>>>>>>>> before the election (the PR team would guide him).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They would only show him evidence that's required to have him
>>>>>>>>>> convinced that he does the right thing. It was the same with Blair
>>>>>>>>>> and Bush.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Obama really isn't in the position to make these calls as people would
>>>>>>>>> believe him to be. All of the above mentioned leaders, if that is
>>>>>>>>> what we want to call them, obey their orders from a higher unseen and
>>>>>>>>> nonpublic group of people. It has been that way since EisenHower
>>>>>>>>> warned of the industrial military complex and the international
>>>>>>>>> banking system.
>>>>>>>> The banking industry funded Obama's election campaign (except the
>>>>>>>> volunteers).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now take it a step further. Who or whom ( and that is the big
>>>>>>> challenge) are or is the banking industry? And whom or who heads it?
>>>>>>> Wallstreet banksters funded his campaign, but a larger question looms as
>>>>>>> to why they'd fund a non-native american. There is still that big
>>>>>>> question about his legitimacy in this regards, as it seems no one or
>>>>>>> authority checks into the birth rights of candidates. Even McCain was
>>>>>>> in question. I've heard and seen the many proofs of Obamas birth
>>>>>>> certificates, but no real hard evidence or proof. Even Dwight D.
>>>>>>> EishenHower has a few quirks in his legitimacy as well and have been
>>>>>>> documented that he has lied. So, after much reflection on our own
>>>>>>> history, we over here have been lied to... big time!
>>>>>> No, they have many copies and proof of his birth in Hawaii. Even the guy
>>>>>> representing those who accuse of Obama of lying admits he's just a puppet
>>>>>> to their slanderous cause.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Odd that even Obama doesn't really know where he was born. After all,
>>>>> he did spend over $10million to hide this fact and this fact is
>>>>> documented out there.
>>>>> As I've posted earlier, there is no agency or legal group that checks
>>>>> for constitutional eligibility for presidency.
>>>>> Obama is just another member of a long line of puppet presidents since
>>>>> 1913.
>>>> It's doubtful that he faked (Bush faked/destroyed him shameful military
>>>> record), but I agree that he was groomed (also by Nobel) to become a world
>>>> manager for those who lead him.
>>>>
>>> You'd be surprised at the skulldudgery involved. People here are slowly
>>> waking up to the lies.
>>
>> I'm not sure I'd be surprised, but I take your point well enough.
>> Besides, have you ever heard of an honest politician? Is there such a
>> thing? In fact, what is honesty anyway? One feels a philosophical
>> debate coming along here :-)
>>
>>
>
> The problem seems to go way back... enough for Will Rodgers to make the
> statement "We've got the best politicians money can buy".
"Honest" politicians are ones that manage to /look/ honest. Obama is one such man.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | http://debian.org
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 22.6%us, 5.0%sy, 0.1%ni, 70.6%id, 1.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.4%si, 0.0%st
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktsw9EACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6yvgCeKF1lZHx3QvWaASRwPoLjfIti
rvoAn3usdpvp9r46DY3p5D+gdu8HaWuR
=OUnW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
