-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Christian Kastner wrote:
> However, I want to note that from the public view, some of these
> issues still remain. I believe that without sharing at least some
> of the context, these issues (and others I might have overlooked)
> will continue to be perceived as hostile, and as such, will
> negatively reflect on the project.
I agree with the above and feel a statement - probably not going back
into history any more than needed to explain the recent events - would
be worthwhile. If neilm is not impartial, could it be delegated?
I disagree with the Wookey's implication that this isn't hard though ;)
Hope that helps,
- --
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)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=/EGQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
