On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:41:19AM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I like Joachim's idea of someone acting as an impartial intermediary, such
> as the DPL, in the interim, and I think we should seriously consider that
> person writing a public statement that goes some way to explain the
> situation impartially - and crucially - publically. Easier said than done,
> I know.
>
To be honest, I'm not convinced that a mediation approach is going to
solve anything. One of the roots of this issue seems to be an abilility
for teams to have effective communication. The amount of time and effort
this would take, especially considering that Daniel is fairly
disconnected from the project these days, would be immense. I also note
that a lot of the backlash seems to have been stired up by the peanut
gallery - I've noted mention of Devuan a few times around this issue.
If people want, I can draw up a statement on what the project's view of
the issue is - it woudn't be impartial though, just as Daniel's view is
not.
Overall though - I do wonder if this is an issue that really requires a
public statement as such. There seems to be more traffic on -private
than elsewhere... Thoughts?
Neil
--
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|
|
