Mark Kent wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
< snip >
>>>>>> I respect Peter's stance as much as he shows respect for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't show respect for nimwits like you
>>>>> You have earned none, you will receive none
>>>>>
>>>>> That may change if you stop being such a dishonest asshole. But I have
>>>>> little hope for you in that matter
>>>>
>>>> Give him a chance, Peter. You seem to be prejudiced, so you're ignoring
>>>> the good and only choosing to see what you consider negative.
>>>>
>>>> Or... to use your terminology, you're using brain cells from only one
>>>> side of your head.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In case you haven't noticed: I treat anybody who misrepresents what
>>> other people say / puts words in their mouth with utter contempt.
>>>
>>> Mark is doing just that. He deserves no respect at all, as he is just as
>>> bad as DFS or billwg. He just is not also a vile racist as DFS is.
>>>
>>> Why should I treat him differently than DumbFullShit? Just because he
>>> happens to be on the "OSS side" he has not earned some "bonus points" to
>>> be able to behave as he does. When I see an asshole I will treat him
>>> accordingly.
>>> So MArk Kent should not be surprised at all of this "treatment". He has
>>> earned it
>>
>> I don't read DFS posts, but when I did, it was nothing like Mark's posts,
>> which are positive, not negative (usually pro, not con).
>>
>> Just to make it clear, I don't have anything against your opinion, but I
>> worry that you're barking up the wrong tree.
>>
>
> Roy - don't worry about this. Peter will come around, or he will not
> come around, time will tell. There's nothing you or I can do about
> that.
>
*You* can do a lot about it.
You could start to be a honest person. You could stop misrepresenting other
people. You could stop putting words in their mouth. *Those* acts would
change quite some
But actually, I don't have any hopes that you would do that. You still have
some support despite being that dishonest twit you are, so you don't see
any need to change your vile act. So you will continue being an asset for
the anti-linux crowd. Because that is exactly what you are. You serve as a
bad example
--
Tact, n.:
The unsaid part of what you're thinking.
|
|
