Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail

____/ The Ghost In The Machine on Friday 14 March 2008 22:37 : \____

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Erik Funkenbusch
> <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  wrote
> on Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:24:18 -0400
> <tovghphl2iv7$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:00:33 -0700, Jim Richardson wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:49:42 -0400,
>>>  Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:41:51 -0700, Jim Richardson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That of course brings up the question of *why* did they not submit it?
>>>>> Only after there was a competing ISO std did they do so.
>>>>
>>>> Not exactly.  The issue was that because ODF had become an ISO standard,
>>>> governments began to be interested in having an ISO standard format.  So,
>>>> because a demand for an ISO standard presented itself, Microsoft decided
>>>> they needed a format that was capable of working with Office in its
>>>> entirety.
>>> 
>>> as I said, only after there was a competing standard was MS interested.
>>
>> No.  Only after their customers began to request a standard document format
>> did Microsoft become interested.
> 
> They already had one.  Microsoft Word.  Why would they need another? ;-)

It made a nice forced upgrade ramp. Ask people who get sent .docx.

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      | LINUX - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
http://Schestowitz.com  |  RHAT GNU/Linux   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
         run-level 2  2008-01-24 14:06                   last=
      http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index