After takin' a swig o' grog, High Plains Thumper belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> Hadron wrote:
>
>> It is truly amazing how you two seem totally unable to grasp
>> the concept of what consistency is and what it means. The rest
>> of the world puts importance on it. You don't even seem able
>> to understand what it IS. It is truly a shame for mankind and
>> Linux that you are able to "advocate" in this way. Your
>> ignorance is palpable.
>
> This is a continuation of the ad hominem attack, see above.
>
> Hadron uses a very common trolling technique. Rather than
> participate in
> the discussion, attempts to deflect the issues by flinging
> insulting retorts, such as homophobic name calling and referring
> to a poster's expressions as "whines". In his insulting, extolls
> a competing operating system by calling it a market leader. This
> confirms he is here to troll.
>
> He misrepresents the truth, showing that he truly is not an
> advocate, referring to Linux as crap. Yet 10 years ago, Linux was
> a complete and suitable desktop product. As you show in the
> following explanations regarding Microsoft concerns expressed
> through the Halloween papers.
I wonder, too, how he deals with the multifarious layouts and user-interface
techniques of all the web sites out there.
The web is a /great/ example of how the inconsistency in UI means very
little, even to the average web-surfing moron.
The issue is simply another tool in Hadron's arse-nal of trolling gimmicks.
--
First rule of public speaking.
First, tell 'em what you're goin' to tell 'em;
then tell 'em;
then tell 'em what you've tole 'em.
|
|
