Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <guj4bd$mvd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Marti van Lin <ml2mst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Mono is not a contribution to Free Software, it is a distraction. In my
>> point of view its a trojan.
>
> How exactly do you think that a GPLed implementation of an open standard
> programming language and runtime can be a trojan?
1. Patents.
2. Version churn. How much of the *current* .Net is covered by the
standard?
These arguments have been hashed out for years. Regardless of the
conclusions drawn, you cannot pretend you don't know that. Or you are
stupid.
Disingenuous or stupid. Your call as to what you want to be called.
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
|
|
