Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <86r5yq1xyo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Mart van de Wege <mvdwege_public@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > In article <guj4bd$mvd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> > Marti van Lin <ml2mst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Mono is not a contribution to Free Software, it is a distraction. In my
>> >> point of view its a trojan.
>> >
>> > How exactly do you think that a GPLed implementation of an open standard
>> > programming language and runtime can be a trojan?
>>
>> 1. Patents.
>
> Only a risk if you are usig ASP.NET, ADO.NET or Windows Forms in your
> applications.
For someone who chides others on what he sees as mere assertions without
proof, you are remarkably reluctant to provide proof for your own
assertions.
In other words, prove it. Put up or shut up.
> None of those are used when using Mono to write Linux programs.
Weell, now I understand why you not merely didn't answer, but even
snipped my second point.
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
|
|
