Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Because Russ seems to be arguing that Debian should be sanctioning
> Linus's behaviours in fora outside of Debian's control by banning him
> from Debian events.
Er, I explicitly said that I did *not* agree with that action. You're
attributing to me the exact opposite of the position that I hold.
Here's what I said again:
Even with Linus, I'm sure that the call for deciding not to invite him
to further Debian events is based on the long-term pattern of behavior,
not this one incident. And even among people who find his position
generally unacceptable, you'll notice that there isn't widespread
support for that action here. (I don't agree with it in this case, for
instance.)
Did I manage to mangle the syntax or presentation of that last bit and
somehow end up more confusing than I intended to be?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxx) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
Please respect the privacy of this mailing list. Some posts may be declassified
3 years after posting as per http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002
Archive: file://master.debian.org/~debian/archive/debian-private/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the web form at <http://db.debian.org/>.
|
|
