JEDIDIAH <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2009-05-16, Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In article <8663g2p6rq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Mart van de Wege <mvdwege_public@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > Only a risk if you are usig ASP.NET, ADO.NET or Windows Forms in your
>>> > applications.
>>>
>>> For someone who chides others on what he sees as mere assertions without
>>> proof, you are remarkably reluctant to provide proof for your own
>>> assertions.
>>>
>>> In other words, prove it. Put up or shut up.
>>
>> The parts of Mono that might be under patents, other than the clones of
>> ASP.NET, ADO.NET, and Windows Forms are covered by the ECMA and ISO
>> standards. All the patents necessary to implement those are covered by
>> a royalty-free RAND license.
Don't lie.
C# is merely under a RAND license. The ECMA patent statement says
*nothing* about royalty-free.
If you start out by lying about easily verified things, why should we
believe any more drivel coming from you?
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
|
|
