After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> In article <gun0tm$hpe$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Wrong as usual. ECMA and ISO only require RAND, but Microsoft, Intel,
>> > and HP (the submitters) went farther than the minimal requirement and
>> > choose to go both RAND *and* royalty-free.
>>
>> Is this Mart trying to promote himself to a higher position than WronG,
>> Willy and High Plains Hypocrite in the "dumbest advocate" table? It sure
>> seems that way.
>
> It seems so--he has their habit of trying to argue on topics for which
> he has not done even a basic bit of research first.
It would be helpful if all of you post some actual supporting information.
--
You love your home and want it to be beautiful.
|
|
