CCASIONALLY I get reminded why productivity and Windows remain an oxymoron. Take authoring in research, for example.
Colleague: juggling processes, restoring and minimising active windows, yet unable to cope with the complexity and clutter in the desktop
Over here: 8 virtual desktops
Colleague: needs to convert many images from encapsulated PostScript to PNG. Approach: start bloatware and wait for a little while; Load all images, assuming physical memory permits it; Wait for a long time for images to be rendered; Save images one by one and change file extension by hand.
Over here: a simple 3-line script does all of the above in just seconds. It uses ImageMagick.
Colleague: uses Wordpad for composition and paint.exe
for simple graphics
Over here: a decent choice of professional tools
Colleague: figure placement handled by hand, hyphenation not possible. LaTeX is not reliable under Windows as it is not ‘native’
More issues: occasional viruses, FS maintenance, regular reboots (thus restoration of workspace is needed)
I estimate that we save several hours per day by opting for Linux. I am left baffled wondering: how can anyone who uses a computer for work possibly choose Windows? Has the world turned upside down?
I will soon be writing about the transition of a close friend to Linux. He recently discovered a world of power computing and left Windows on the curb. Linux stereotypes are often the main peril.