Digg Changes Algorithm
EMOCRACY has returned to Digg.com, all at the expense of arguably-deserved rewards (power and advantage) given to top site contributers. These latest algorithm changes affect me as well, though I have not been submitting any stories for a fortnight.
Will this prove to be a wise move by Digg’s administrators? Was it well overdue? History will tell. But here’s a sure bet: top users, whose labour contributed the most to Digg, are utterly dissatisfied by the large.
I noticed that fellow Diggers are unable to get front pagers. The frustration and loss or power is likely to discourage further participation. The problem is thus resolved not only by changing the rules, but also by demoralising regulars. It’s somewhat of a scare tactic, which is a bad idea no matter how you look at it. Good for newbies perhaps, but it drives away the “power Diggers”—those who care the most about the Web site, know it best, and submit the least duplicates. A shame really…






Filed under: 
used to envision myself coding for the rest. Of. My. Life. many times I thought I had it all figured out. And nevertheless, experience suggests that preferences, trends and prospects always change. The industry nowadays is dynamic, volatile, and ever-changing. Thus, predictions that are long-term are utterly silly.

HENEVER I approach kde-look.org (
PPLE’S moves seem slightly worrisome. They have just